A great article by Thomas Kidd here. Kidd discusses Miroslav Volf’s Allah: A Christian Response. Volf, a Yale Professor, is one of the most prominent Christian academicians.
Volf, like George W. Bush, answers the question affirmatively. Kidd seems not so sure. America's "key Founders" (the first 4 Presidents, Ben Franklin) like Wolf and Bush, answered the question affirmatively.
(As noted many times before, these Founders thought uncoverted Great Spirit worshipping Native Americans worshipped the same God they did. And the Great Spirit, unlike Allah, doesn't even claim to be the God of Abraham.)
I saw Volf speak live last year at the CPS Conference at Gordon College. (Video of said presentation below.)
The Jon Rowe Archives
I'm a libertarian lawyer and college professor. I blog on religion, history, constitutional law, government policy, philosophy, sexuality, and the American Founding. Everything is fair game though. Over the years, I've been involved in numerous group blogs that come and go. This blog archives almost everything I write. Email your questions or comments to rowjonathan@aol.com
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
Friday, May 17, 2013
Wednesday, May 08, 2013
JAMES WILSON AND THE SCOTTISH ENLIGHTENMENT
That's the title to a working paper by William Ewald, Professor of Law and Philosophy, University of Pennsylvania and that you may access here. I haven't read it yet. But for those interested, dig in.
Mark David Hall On Key v. Non-Key Founders
I didn't know Mark David Hall, of George Fox University, had a blog (with fellow George Foxers). Check it out here.
Sunday, May 05, 2013
Long Before David Barton, We Had American Presbyterians (to conflate the kingdoms)
Read about it from DG Hart here.
Suggestions for Researching James Wilson's Life and Works
Galen L. Fletcher
Brigham Young University - J. Reuben Clark Law School
July 22, 2011Download here. I found this while googling today.
James Wilson on Liberal Democratic Theory
That is small l liberal, small d democratic.
Hat tip to Bill Fortenberry for reminding me of this magnificent essay, done in 1774, by James Wilson which contains a passage that pithily summarizes the liberal democratic theory that undergirds the Declaration of Independence.
Wilson noted:
Hat tip to Bill Fortenberry for reminding me of this magnificent essay, done in 1774, by James Wilson which contains a passage that pithily summarizes the liberal democratic theory that undergirds the Declaration of Independence.
Wilson noted:
All men are, by nature, equal and free: no one has a right to any authority over another without his consent: all lawful government is founded on the consent of those who are subject to it: such consent was given with a view to ensure and to increase the happiness of the governed, above what they could enjoy in an independent and unconnected state of nature. The consequence is, that the happiness of the society is the first law of every government.c
This rule is founded on the law of nature: it must control every political maxim: it must regulate the legislature itself.d The people have a right to insist that this rule be observed; and are entitled to demand a moral security that the legislature will observe it. If they have not the first, they are slaves; if they have not the second, they are, every moment, exposed to slavery. For “civil liberty is nothing else but natural liberty, devested of that part which constituted the independence of individuals, by the authority which it confers on sovereigns, attended with a right of insisting upon their making a good use of their authority, and with a moral security that this right will have its effect.”Liberty and Equality, it should be noted, are the twin pillars of small l liberalism.
Wednesday, April 24, 2013
Allitt Reviews Frazer For Claremont
Writing for The Claremont Institute, Patrick Allitt reviews Gregg Frazer's book.
Sunday, April 21, 2013
Thursday, April 18, 2013
Timothy Dwight on the Godless Constitution
Speaking of Timothy Dwight, his slam on the godlessness of America's Constitution can be viewed in its full context here.
As he put it in 1812:
As he put it in 1812:
The second of these reasons is, the sinful character of our nation. Notwithstanding the prevalence of Religion, which I have described, the irreligion, and the wickedness, of our land are such, as to furnish a most painful and melancholy prospect to a serious mind. We formed our Constitution without any acknowledgment of God ; without any recognition of his mercies to us, as a people, of his government, or even of his existence. The Convention, by which it was formed, never asked, even once, his direction, or his blessing upon their labours. Thus we commenced our national existence under the present system, without God. 1 wish I could say, that a disposition to render him the reverence, due to his great Name, and the gratitude, demanded by his innumerable mercies, had been more public, visible, uniform, and fervent.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)